Jedi Security Policy Group

U.S.–Mexico Security & Humanitarian Partnership (SMHP)

Government Policy Whitepaper • October 2025 • Prepared for the United States Congress, U.S. Department of State, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, and the Government of the United Mexican States.

0. Cover & Document Information

Issuing Organization: Jedi Security Policy Group (JSPG)

Title: U.S.–Mexico Security & Humanitarian Partnership (SMHP) — Government Policy Whitepaper

Date: October 2025

Purpose: Present a lawful, sovereign‑respecting bilateral framework that integrates security cooperation with humanitarian relief and institutional reform.

Statement of Principles: Mexican sovereignty; mutual consent; non‑intervention; human‑rights protection; transparency; and joint accountability.

1. Executive Summary

The U.S.–Mexico Security & Humanitarian Partnership (SMHP) modernizes cross‑border cooperation against transnational organized crime while expanding humanitarian relief and institutional reform in affected regions. Building on lessons from the Mérida Initiative and the High‑Level Security Dialogue, SMHP shifts focus from equipment‑heavy enforcement to rule‑of‑law capacity‑building, financial‑crime disruption, intelligence fusion, and community stabilization.

Mexico retains full sovereignty and operational command. U.S. personnel serve only in advisory/technical roles and enter Mexico exclusively via written Territorial Entry Authorizations (TEAs). Core instruments include a Joint Humanitarian Fund (JHF), joint AML operations, prosecutor/forensics training, and a Joint Oversight Board (JOB) that publishes quarterly audits.

Targets (Year 3): ≥25% reduction in major transnational‑crime indicators; ≥30% increase in humanitarian service coverage; sustained growth in illicit‑asset seizures; measurable improvements in public trust.

2. Background & Problem Statement

The 1,954‑mile U.S.–Mexico border is economically vital yet exploited by transnational criminal organizations (TCOs). Illicit flows of drugs, weapons, people, and money degrade security and strain communities on both sides. While the Mérida Initiative (2008–2021) provided training/equipment, it lacked standardized metrics, independent audits, and a locally owned humanitarian arm. The Bicentennial Framework (from 2021) emphasized shared responsibility but suffered from fragmented implementation.

Humanitarian imperative: Violence, extortion, and displacement erode livelihoods, fuel migration, and undermine trust in institutions. Enforcement alone cannot reverse these trends; durable stability requires synchronized aid delivery, infrastructure repair, and economic recovery within a rule‑of‑law framework.

Policy problem: the absence of a sustainable, legally anchored, publicly accountable mechanism that links security enforcement with humanitarian and governance outcomes. SMHP addresses this gap.

3. Strategic Objectives

Objective 1 — Rule‑of‑Law & Judicial Capacity

Objective 2 — Financial Disruption & AML

Objective 3 — Integrated Humanitarian Stabilization

Objective 4 — Joint Intelligence & Technical Cooperation

Objective 5 — Transparency & Public Accountability

4. Legal Basis & Existing Frameworks

4.1 Treaty and Statutory Foundations

4.2 Relationship to Existing Frameworks

SMHP complements the Mérida Initiative, the Bicentennial Framework, and the U.S.–Mexico Border Health Commission, while using USMCA‑style transparency for dispute resolution and reporting.

4.3 Human‑Rights & Sovereignty Safeguards

4.4 Multilateral Compatibility

Aligned with the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2000) and the UN Convention against Corruption (2003); compatible with observer roles for UN agencies.

5. Proposed Bilateral Agreement

The SMHP Agreement is a binding, sovereignty‑respecting instrument comprised of thirteen articles.

Article I — Purpose & Principles

Counter TCOs; promote human rights and rule of law; deliver humanitarian assistance; uphold non‑intervention.

Article II — Definitions

Defines Assistance Personnel, Advisory Mission, Humanitarian Fund, JOB, TEA, and related terms.

Article III — Scope of Cooperation

Prohibited: unilateral enforcement, kinetic operations, permanent bases.

Article IV — Territorial Entry Authorizations (TEAs)

Issued by SRE; specify personnel, duration, geography, mission scope, and termination/reporting terms. Mexican criminal jurisdiction applies to offenses by U.S. personnel on Mexican soil.

Article V — Command & Control

All operations under Mexican command; U.S. advisors have no arrest authority. Coordination via a Joint Mission Directorate (SRE and U.S. State/INL).

Article VI — Humanitarian Fund & Aid Delivery

Creates a Joint Humanitarian Fund (SHCP + USAID dual‑signature). Quarterly published audits. Funds clinics, schools, and stabilization in targeted municipalities.

Article VII — Information & Intelligence Sharing

Builds a Bilateral Intelligence Fusion Network (CNI with DEA/FBI). Data governed by each nation’s privacy statutes; use beyond scope requires written consent.

Article VIII — Financial Cooperation & Asset Recovery

Coordinated asset freezing/recovery under UNCAC; proceeds allocated 60% to Mexican victim‑restitution, 40% to capacity‑building.

Article IX — Oversight & Audit

JOB includes 5+5 voting members and 4 observers; quarterly bilingual reports; external audits.

Article X — Legal Jurisdiction & Accountability

Mexico retains exclusive criminal jurisdiction for acts on its territory; U.S. retains jurisdiction over U.S. nationals outside TEA parameters. Disputes resolved by consultation or UNCITRAL arbitration.

Article XI — Duration & Termination

Five‑year initial term; 90‑day termination notice; immediate suspension for serious human‑rights violations.

Article XII — Amendments & Entry into Force

Amendments require legislative processes in both countries; enters into force upon exchange of notes.

Article XIII — Public Disclosure & Transparency

Treaty text, JOB reports, and budgets published in English and Spanish with limited redactions for live investigations.

6. Humanitarian & Development Initiatives

6.1 Joint Humanitarian Fund (JHF)

Co‑financed, administered by SHCP with USAID co‑signature; Year‑1 capitalization: USD $1.2B. Audited by ASF and GAO; published quarterly.

6.2 Health & Medical Relief

6.3 Food Security & Basic Needs

6.4 Education & Community Reconstruction

6.5 Economic Revitalization

6.6 Transparency & Community Engagement

Bilingual online portal; town‑hall sessions; SMS feedback; quarterly press briefings by SRE and State.

6.7 Expected Impact (Year 1–3)

MetricTarget (Year 3)Lead
Households receiving food aid250,000JHF / DICONSA / WFP
Clinics operational80SHCP / USAID
Youth trained/employed20,000Youth Resilience Corps
Women entrepreneurs funded5,000Women’s Fund Program

7. Implementation Plan (30/60/90 Day + Year 1)

First 30 Days

Days 31–60

Days 61–90

Year 1

Milestones

MilestoneLead (MX/US)TargetVerification
JMD & JOB operationalSRE / State(INL)Day 30Signed charters
Fusion Centers activeSSPC / DEADay 45Ops reports
First JHF projects fundedSHCP / USAIDDay 60Disbursement logs
JOB Q1 auditJOB SecretariatDay 90Published report

8. Budget & Resource Allocations

Three‑year total: USD $7.8B (U.S. $5.7B; Mexico $2.1B). Year‑1 total: $2.8B.

CategoryDescriptionYear‑1 (USD M)Managing Entities
Humanitarian & Stabilization (JHF)Clinics, food, education, water1,200SHCP / USAID
Institutional StrengtheningForensics, judicial training800FGR / INL / USAID
Financial & Technical IntelFusion centers, AML systems500UIF / FinCEN / DEA
Oversight & GovernanceJOB, audits, portal300JOB / GAO / ASF
Total2,800

Controls: dual‑signature disbursement; OCDS procurement; quarterly fiscal dashboards; GAO/ASF audits; AML vetting.

9. Oversight & Accountability Mechanisms

9.1 Joint Oversight Board (JOB)

9.2 Audit & Evaluation

FunctionLeadReviewerFrequency
Financial audit (JHF)ASFGAOAnnual
Programmatic auditGAO / USAID OIGSRE Internal AuditSemi‑annual
Human‑rights reviewCNDHU.S. State/DRLAnnual
AML ops auditUIF / FinCENJOB Fiscal SubcommitteeQuarterly

9.3 Transparency Portal & Legislative Oversight

Discloses all contracts ≥ $25k within 30 days; machine‑readable data under the U.S. OPEN Government Data Act and Mexico’s General Law of Transparency. Semi‑annual classified briefings to U.S. Senate committees; quarterly reporting to the Mexican Senate.

9.4 Whistleblower & Corrective Action

Encrypted reporting channels; non‑retaliation clauses; 30‑day remedial plans for findings; escalation up to program suspension for severe breaches.

10. Expected Outcomes & Metrics / Conclusion

10.1 Outcome Domains & KPIs (Year‑3 Targets)

DomainKPIsTarget
Rule‑of‑LawConviction rate ↑; case duration ↓≥20% improvement
Financial IntegrityAsset seizures ↑; wire alerts resolved ↑≥40% increase
Humanitarian ReliefHouseholds aided; clinics rebuilt; youth trained250k; 80; 20k
TransparencyDisbursements online; JOB on time100%; 100%
Public TrustApproval index; corruption perception≥60%; +5 points
Migration PressureOut‑migration from pilot zones−25%

10.2 Evaluation Schedule

10.3 Conclusion

The SMHP replaces transactional aid and ad‑hoc security programs with a transparent, treaty‑grounded architecture that binds both nations to measurable, humane outcomes. It preserves sovereignty, fortifies judicial integrity, and demonstrates that cooperative investment in justice and livelihoods can outperform coercive enforcement—building homes, not destroying them.